<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Where are all the old ,uns?</title><link>http://bourdain.blog.co.uk/</link><atom:link xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://bourdain.blog.co.uk/feed/rss2/comments/"/><description></description><language>en-EU</language><generator>MokoFeed</generator><ttl>10</ttl><item><title>In response to:title-1851377</title><link>http://bourdain.blog.co.uk/2007/03/05/title~1851377/#c3048452</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:bourdain.blog.co.uk,2007-03-16:/2007/03/05/title~1851377/#c3048452</guid><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 23:47:24 +0100</pubDate><description>Great  Thank you</description><comments>http://bourdain.blog.co.uk/2007/03/05/title~1851377/#c3048452</comments></item><item><title>In response to:title-1851377</title><link>http://bourdain.blog.co.uk/2007/03/05/title~1851377/#c2955438</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:bourdain.blog.co.uk,2007-03-05:/2007/03/05/title~1851377/#c2955438</guid><pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 18:04:19 +0100</pubDate><description>Why the sigh? </description><comments>http://bourdain.blog.co.uk/2007/03/05/title~1851377/#c2955438</comments></item><item><title>In response to:title-1851377</title><link>http://bourdain.blog.co.uk/2007/03/05/title~1851377/#c2955140</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:bourdain.blog.co.uk,2007-03-05:/2007/03/05/title~1851377/#c2955140</guid><pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 17:29:22 +0100</pubDate><description>Beautiful and touching :**:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Mx</description><comments>http://bourdain.blog.co.uk/2007/03/05/title~1851377/#c2955140</comments></item><item><title>In response to:EYES</title><link>http://bourdain.blog.co.uk/2007/02/25/eyes~1802962/#c2912119</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:bourdain.blog.co.uk,2007-02-28:/2007/02/25/eyes~1802962/#c2912119</guid><pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 10:52:34 +0100</pubDate><description>Au contraire! I just wasn't sure if it was meant to be read just yet. C'est tout! &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
M.</description><comments>http://bourdain.blog.co.uk/2007/02/25/eyes~1802962/#c2912119</comments></item><item><title>In response to:EYES</title><link>http://bourdain.blog.co.uk/2007/02/25/eyes~1802962/#c2912076</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:bourdain.blog.co.uk,2007-02-28:/2007/02/25/eyes~1802962/#c2912076</guid><pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 10:44:41 +0100</pubDate><description>I take it you didn't like it. Was it the sentimenmt or the poor construction....or both?&lt;br&gt;
B</description><comments>http://bourdain.blog.co.uk/2007/02/25/eyes~1802962/#c2912076</comments></item><item><title>In response to:EYES</title><link>http://bourdain.blog.co.uk/2007/02/25/eyes~1802962/#c2911888</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:bourdain.blog.co.uk,2007-02-28:/2007/02/25/eyes~1802962/#c2911888</guid><pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 10:05:36 +0100</pubDate><description>Could resist a peek at "Words and Deeds"&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
M</description><comments>http://bourdain.blog.co.uk/2007/02/25/eyes~1802962/#c2911888</comments></item><item><title>In response to:EYES</title><link>http://bourdain.blog.co.uk/2007/02/25/eyes~1802962/#c2897183</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:bourdain.blog.co.uk,2007-02-26:/2007/02/25/eyes~1802962/#c2897183</guid><pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:17:46 +0100</pubDate><description>What can I say - pass the hanky :'(&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
M</description><comments>http://bourdain.blog.co.uk/2007/02/25/eyes~1802962/#c2897183</comments></item></channel></rss>
