<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><id>tag:bourdain.blog.co.uk,2009-11-10:/</id><title>Where are all the old ,uns?</title><link rel="self" href="http://bourdain.blog.co.uk/feed/atom/comments/"/><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bourdain.blog.co.uk/"/><generator version="1.0">MokoFeed</generator><updated>2009-11-10T06:48:40+01:00</updated><entry><id>tag:bourdain.blog.co.uk,2007-03-16:/2007/03/05/title~1851377/#c3048452</id><title>In response to:title-1851377</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bourdain.blog.co.uk/2007/03/05/title~1851377/#c3048452"/><author><name>FunkyFarmer</name></author><published>2007-03-16T23:47:24+01:00</published><updated>2007-03-16T23:47:24+01:00</updated><content type="html">Great  Thank you</content></entry><entry><id>tag:bourdain.blog.co.uk,2007-03-05:/2007/03/05/title~1851377/#c2955438</id><title>In response to:title-1851377</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bourdain.blog.co.uk/2007/03/05/title~1851377/#c2955438"/><author><name>bourdain</name></author><published>2007-03-05T18:04:19+01:00</published><updated>2007-03-05T18:04:19+01:00</updated><content type="html">Why the sigh? </content></entry><entry><id>tag:bourdain.blog.co.uk,2007-03-05:/2007/03/05/title~1851377/#c2955140</id><title>In response to:title-1851377</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bourdain.blog.co.uk/2007/03/05/title~1851377/#c2955140"/><author><name>la_spice</name></author><published>2007-03-05T17:29:22+01:00</published><updated>2007-03-05T17:29:22+01:00</updated><content type="html">Beautiful and touching :**:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Mx</content></entry><entry><id>tag:bourdain.blog.co.uk,2007-02-28:/2007/02/25/eyes~1802962/#c2912119</id><title>In response to:EYES</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bourdain.blog.co.uk/2007/02/25/eyes~1802962/#c2912119"/><author><name>la_spice</name></author><published>2007-02-28T10:52:34+01:00</published><updated>2007-02-28T10:52:34+01:00</updated><content type="html">Au contraire! I just wasn't sure if it was meant to be read just yet. C'est tout! &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
M.</content></entry><entry><id>tag:bourdain.blog.co.uk,2007-02-28:/2007/02/25/eyes~1802962/#c2912076</id><title>In response to:EYES</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bourdain.blog.co.uk/2007/02/25/eyes~1802962/#c2912076"/><author><name>bourdain</name></author><published>2007-02-28T10:44:41+01:00</published><updated>2007-02-28T10:44:41+01:00</updated><content type="html">I take it you didn't like it. Was it the sentimenmt or the poor construction....or both?&lt;br&gt;
B</content></entry><entry><id>tag:bourdain.blog.co.uk,2007-02-28:/2007/02/25/eyes~1802962/#c2911888</id><title>In response to:EYES</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bourdain.blog.co.uk/2007/02/25/eyes~1802962/#c2911888"/><author><name>la_spice</name></author><published>2007-02-28T10:05:36+01:00</published><updated>2007-02-28T10:05:36+01:00</updated><content type="html">Could resist a peek at "Words and Deeds"&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
M</content></entry><entry><id>tag:bourdain.blog.co.uk,2007-02-26:/2007/02/25/eyes~1802962/#c2897183</id><title>In response to:EYES</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bourdain.blog.co.uk/2007/02/25/eyes~1802962/#c2897183"/><author><name>la_spice</name></author><published>2007-02-26T15:17:46+01:00</published><updated>2007-02-26T15:17:46+01:00</updated><content type="html">What can I say - pass the hanky :'(&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
M</content></entry></feed>
